• Products
    • Our Products
    • Relyence FMEA
    • Relyence FRACAS
    • Relyence Fault Tree
    • Relyence Reliability Prediction
    • Relyence RBD
    • Relyence Maintainability Prediction
    • Relyence Weibull
    • Relyence ALT
    • Relyence Studio
  • Industries
    • Industries Overview
    • Aerospace
    • Automotive
    • Commercial
    • Consumer Products
    • Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Medical
    • Oil & Gas
    • Telecom
  • Services
    • Our Services
    • Training
    • Implementation
    • Technical Support
    • Resources
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Join Us
    • Why Relyence
    • Contact Us
  • Sign In

Call us today! 724.832.1900

info@relyence.com
RelyenceRelyence
  • Products
    • Our Products
    • Relyence FMEA
    • Relyence FRACAS
    • Relyence Fault Tree
    • Relyence Reliability Prediction
    • Relyence RBD
    • Relyence Maintainability Prediction
    • Relyence Weibull
    • Relyence ALT
    • Relyence Studio
  • Industries
    • Industries Overview
    • Aerospace
    • Automotive
    • Commercial
    • Consumer Products
    • Defense
    • Healthcare
    • Medical
    • Oil & Gas
    • Telecom
  • Services
    • Our Services
    • Training
    • Implementation
    • Technical Support
    • Resources
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Join Us
    • Why Relyence
    • Contact Us
  • Sign In

Is it CAPA or is it FRACAS?

Home » Is it CAPA or is it FRACAS?
Relyence CAPA Dashboard

Is it CAPA or is it FRACAS?

January 6, 2017 CAPA, FRACAS

What’s in a name? Or, more appropriately, what’s in an acronym? In the corrective action world acronyms are the norm. CAPA is an acronym for Corrective and Preventive Action (or sometimes Corrective Action/Preventive Action). FRACAS is an acronym for Failure Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System. Adding to those, you may see: CAR, PAR, FRB, NCR, SCAR, CPAR, RCA, IFR, DRACAS, PRACA, PRACAS, CI. To makes sense of this alphabet soup, and help you decide what’s best for your use, let’s start at the beginning.

The Acronyms of Corrective Action Systems

This is a collective of the more commonly used acronyms you may encounter in the corrective action world; however, it is by no means intended to be comprehensive. Feel free to leave us comments with acronyms you prefer or have seen.

  • CAPA: Corrective and Preventive Action, also Corrective Action/Preventive Action
  • FRACAS: Failure Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System
  • CAR: Corrective Action Request
  • PAR: Preventive Action Request
  • FRB: Failure Review Board
  • NCR: Nonconformance Report
  • SCAR: Supplier Corrective Action Request
  • CPAR: Corrective Preventive Action Request
  • RCA: Root Cause Analysis
  • IFR: Incident Failure Report
  • DRACAS: Defect (sometimes Data) Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System
  • PRACA: Problem Reporting and Corrective Action
  • PRACAS: Problem Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System
  • CI: Continuous Improvement
  • QMS: Quality Management System

The Key Two: CAPA and FRACAS

It appears to look daunting when you start trying to wade through all the acronyms and meanings.  However, many of these terms overlap and have similar meanings, or refer to specifics. For this article, we will consider two that are commonly used when referring to an overall process for handling failures: CAPA and FRACAS.

Looking at the list of acronyms, you can see that several others refer to elements or steps of these processes: all the request or report acronyms for example. Others are additional acronyms used for referring to overall process, but are just not as commonly seen: PRACA, PRACAS, DRACAS. Lastly, there are more global acronyms that refer to a complete quality program that may include CAPA or FRACAS as part of the whole: CI and QMS.

What is FRACAS?

As stated, FRACAS is a Failure Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System. A well-organized FRACAS is a closed-loop process for the management of failures of any type. The steps in a FRACAS involve:

  • Failure Reporting: a failure occurrence is logged in some manner.
  • Analysis: the failure is analyzed to determine the cause.
  • Corrective Action: the steps necessary to correct, prevent, or mitigate the failure in the future are identified, implemented, and verified.

The term FRACAS has its roots in a Department of Defense standard published in 1985 that defined the FRACAS process, MIL-STD-2155. Therefore, FRACAS is a term widely used and recognized in industries related to military, defense, aerospace, etc. Because of its long history and wide acceptance, FRACAS is used throughout many commercial industries as well.

New to FRACAS?

What is CAPA?

CAPA is also a closed-loop process for the management of failures or nonconformance. A CAPA process identifies actions to be taken to eliminate or mitigate failures or nonconformance issues related to manufacturing, procedures, processes, systems, or services in an organization. CAPA is closely tied to quality management.

In some industries, CAPA is required in order to meet regulatory standards. For example, industries such as pharmaceutical and medical devices, have compliance requirements from the FDA that include having a CAPA in place. CAPAs also are part of many practices in the automotive industry. This is also the case for compliance with ISO standards, GMP and other Good Practices (GxP).

There is not a single CAPA standard; however there are many process cycles that are in use to support a corrective action system. A commonly known one is the 8D Problem Solving process. In general, 8D (or 8 Disciplines) is an 8-step methodology employed for process and/or product improvement.  The 8 steps are:

  • D1: Establish the team.
  • D2: Describe the problem.
  • D3: Repair the problem.
  • D4: Determine the root cause.
  • D5: Define corrective action.
  • D6: Implement the corrective action.
  • D7: Prevent recurrence.
  • D8: Recognize the team.

Other processes are also used for product and process improvement. PDCA (plan, do, check, act) is a 4-step process also referred to as the Deming cycle or circle, and the Shewart cycle. DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) is a continuous improvement system often used in Six Sigma programs.

A wide range of CAPA processes are unique to an organization. The goal of a CAPA remains the same, however, the manner that this is achieved can be left up to each organization to modify the process as best fits their needs.

The Heart of It All: Corrective Action

From this very high level overview, you can see that at the heart of a FRACAS or CAPA is a process to manage issues. The long-range goal is to ensure your organization is meeting quality, reliability, and continuous improvement goals.

Whether your organization employs a CAPA, FRACAS. Corrective Action, or another name, the choice of terms and standards may be in place due to industry requirements, compliance needs, corporate objectives, historical reasons, or simply preference. In general terms, your issue management process is part of your quality management system (QMS), even if it stands alone or is part of an integrated quality platform.

To learn how to maximize the benefits of your corrective action system, read our informative white paper, “Getting the Most Our of Your Closed-Loop Corrective Action Process.”

Relyence FRACAS

Relyence FRACAS fully supports both CAPA and FRACAS processes. It offers a robust platform for tracking and managing your corrective and preventive action process. It ensures that your process is in compliance and under control with a completely customizable process flow, built-in escalation of issues, and workflow and reminder features. Our powerful corrective action software incorporates a wealth of additional features for comprehensive correction action management including: out-of-the box support for 8D, DMAIC, and PDCA processes, customizable process control, integrated workflow, team assignments, data importing and exporting, flexible reporting, and a powerful dashboard. Relyence FRACAS also incorporates our unique and innovative Failure Direct Connect capability that enables you to integrate your FMEA and FRACAS data for a cohesive and well-organized approach for failure data management.

You can effectively manage your product, product, or service related issues to monitor quality, reliability, safety, risk, and environmental concerns. Relyence FRACAS can help you meet your ISO-9001, ISO/TS 16949, AS 9100, FDA, GMP, and any QMS requirements.

Lastly, Relyence FRACAS, as all Relyence tools, was designed with today’s collaborative, virtual teams in mind. Relyence FRACAS is web-based, mobile-friendly, and device independent. Your team is most effective when using Relyence FRACAS.

You can register for a completely free, fully functional trial of Relyence FRACAS. You are also welcome to contact our sales team for more details or schedule your own personal live product demonstration.

Tags: 8Dcontinuous improvementISO-9001QMS
Share

You also might be interested in

An Overview of FRACAS Methodologies

An Overview of FRACAS Methodologies

Jan 16, 2023

What is FRACAS? FRACAS is an acronym for Failure Reporting,[...]

Implementing FRACAS: Build of Buy?

Implementing FRACAS: Build or Buy?

Nov 14, 2022

Jump to: What are the FRACAS Standards? | Implementing FRACAS[...]

FRACAS Workflow

Using Approvals and Notifications

Mar 7, 2017

Relyence FRACAS offers two unique and fully customizable capabilities to[...]

Search

Recent Posts

  • Maintainability Prediction: A Comprehensive Overview
  • Welcome to Relyence 2023 Release 1!
  • An Overview of FRACAS Methodologies
  • Implementing FRACAS: Build or Buy?
  • FTA vs. RBD: Which System Modeling Tool is Right for Me?

Categories

  • 217Plus
  • ALT
  • ANSI/VITA 51.1
  • CAPA
  • China's GJB/z 299
  • Dashboard
  • Fault Tree
  • FMEA
  • FRACAS
  • Fundamentals
  • General
  • How-to
  • Knowledge Bank
  • Life Data Analysis
  • Maintainability Prediction
  • MIL-HDBK-217
  • MTBF
  • News
  • NPRD/EPRD
  • NSWC Mechanical
  • Quality
  • RBD
  • Reliability
  • Reliability Block Diagram
  • Reliability Prediction
  • Reliability Studio
  • Telcordia
  • Weibull

Tags

8D AIAG AIAG & VDA always-in-sync AP Availability China's GJB/z 299 cold standby continuous improvement Control Plan COPQ CP dashboard DFMEA EPRD fault tree fmea FMECA fracas FTA GJB/z 299 Intelligent Part Mapping Knowledge Bank MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-STD-1629 MTBF MTTF MTTR NPRD PCP PFD PFMEA Process Flow Diagram QMS RBD Redundancy Reliability Reliability Block Diagram reliability prediction RPN standby Telcordia Weibull What-If? Workflow

Connect with us

Start your free trial today! Try for Free!
Relyence Corporation logo

At Relyence, we have a passion for always improving. We believe in always creating, always innovating, and always being the best. We believe that in the software world, and in the technology space, we must always be moving ahead. We need to keep pace with all the new technological innovations, as well as new methodologies in industries. We continually work on product development, new capabilities, feature enhancement, and ever improving our tools.

AIAG Member Logo

FIND US HERE

  • Relyence Corporation
  • 540 Pellis Road, Greensburg, PA 15601
  • 724.832.1900
  • wecare@relyence.com
  • https://relyence.com

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Sitemap

FRESH FROM OUR BLOG

  • Maintainability Prediction: A Comprehensive Overview
  • Welcome to Relyence 2023 Release 1!
  • An Overview of FRACAS Methodologies

© 2023 Relyence Corporation All Rights Reserved. Relyence® is a registered trademark of Relyence Corporation.

  • Try for Free!
Prev Next